Sphere: Coupling vs numerical aperture#

Importing the package dependencies: numpy, PyMieSim

import numpy as np
from PyMieSim.units import ureg
from PyOptik import Material

from PyMieSim import experiment
from PyMieSim import single

source = experiment.source.Gaussian(
    wavelength=500 * ureg.nanometer,
    polarization=0 * ureg.degree,
    optical_power=1e-3 * ureg.watt,
    NA=0.2 * ureg.AU,
)

scatterer = experiment.scatterer.Sphere(
    diameter=500e-9 * ureg.meter,
    refractive_index=Material.BK7,
    medium_refractive_index=1 * ureg.RIU,
    source=source,
)

detector = experiment.detector.Photodiode(
    NA=np.linspace(0.1, 1, 150) * ureg.AU,
    phi_offset=0 * ureg.degree,
    gamma_offset=[0, 10] * ureg.degree,
    sampling=2000 * ureg.AU,
)

setup = experiment.Setup(scatterer=scatterer, source=source, detector=detector)

dataframe = setup.get("coupling", drop_unique_level=True)

dataframe.plot(x="detector:NA")

single_source = single.Gaussian(
    wavelength=950 * ureg.nanometer,
    polarization=0 * ureg.degree,
    optical_power=1e-3 * ureg.watt,
    NA=0.2 * ureg.AU,
)

single_scatterer = single.scatterer.Sphere(
    diameter=500 * ureg.nanometer,
    refractive_index=1.5 * ureg.RIU,
    medium_refractive_index=1 * ureg.RIU,
    source=single_source,
)

print(single_scatterer.Qsca)
coupling vs NA
1.0161565882863277 dimensionless

Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.393 seconds)

Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery